On Mar 2, 2004, at 2:22 PM, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
| Manuel, I'm sorry to see that you have no intentions to do work on a
| solution.
Probably a misunderstood. Remember, since before the begining of
gsweb, I was open to cooperation to avoid doing same things twice.
But, honestly, begining cooperation message with "Yet with OGo we now
do have a high quality and proven WebObjects clone and gnustep-web is
somewhat obsolete for practical purposes" is very strange. Cultural
difference ? :-(
No, I don't think so. But I'm not really willing to discuss that anymore
with you, since you are obviously not very keen on working out a
solution if that may involve dropping own code even if this is based on
objective reasons.
Really, I want to talk about that with the other gnustep-web developers
and users and of course with GNUstep in general (so far no one came up -
so is gnustep-web just you and David?).
The discussion with you is stuck and I don't think we get it running
again. Feel free to make *productive* suggestions, and I consider.