[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cocotron

From: Oliver Langer
Subject: Re: Cocotron
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 01:55:08 +0100

Hi Gregory,

you're right - it is very desirable to discuss this topic with all GSsteppers, althoug we may not be able to do so :( But I see this session only as a possibility to exchange some ideas which we have to present and discuss further on this mailing list.

Of couse, having a GNUstep Conference Stream would be very cool :) How? Webcam + skype??? May FOSDEM provide a related infrastructure?

Best regards,

Am 27.12.2006 um 01:07 schrieb Gregory John Casamento:


I'm wondering if there's any way... since I may not be able to make it there physically, for me to participate in the discussion via telephone. This is something that I would very much like to participate actively in instead of hearing and commenting on what happened after the fact.

Does anyone know of a service that can be used for teleconferencing that's relatively cheap?

Later, GJC

Gregory Casamento
## GNUstep Chief Maintainer

----- Original Message ----
From: Oliver Langer <address@hidden>
To: Gregory John Casamento <address@hidden>
Cc: Helge Hess <address@hidden>; GNUstep Discussion <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 6:56:32 PM
Subject: Re: Cocotron

Hi @all,

i read the whole thread just a couple of seconds ago and want to
refer to the "Discussion at FOSDEM" only. The idea behind is to
discuss what to do with all the "utility" packages which have been
developed for or based on GNUstep in the past. "We" may also take the
time to present/name some of them.

@Helge: We should start preparing this session...seems to be
important :) At the beginning of the next week i can start on this

@Gregory: You are right! In case we run this session definitely have
to document it - i can do this then.


Am 24.12.2006 um 17:56 schrieb Gregory John Casamento:


I'll write some other mail and then stop posting :-) I would be very
happy to discuss those things on FOSDEM, this is much more efficient
and less error prone (misunderstandings happen to easily ;-). Lets
find out there what can be done to reduce duplication of efforts.

The problem with "Discussing it at FOSDEM" is that I, and many
others, may not be at FOSDEM.  If you guys do end up discussing
this there, please post a followup to the list.

Thanks, GJC

Gregory Casamento
## GNUstep Chief Maintainer

Discuss-gnustep mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]