Re: Re: [Dotgnu-libjit] Re: [Dotgnu-pnet] CVS is down -> Switching to SVN?

[Kirill Kononenko]

Hi all


My vote is for anything that is not cvs. I have been using svn for
quiet long and I cannot complain about svn. Anything even more
sophisticated like git is better even.


Thanks,
Kirill

2009/6/3  <address@hidden>:
> On Jun 3, 2009 2:36am, Klaus Treichel <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, den 02.06.2009, 20:03 +0200 schrieb Radek Polak:
>>
>> > Alexander Stein wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
>> > > I know, I'm not an active developer, but I think switching to svn
>> > > wouldn't
>>
>> > > change anything in such situations, because you also need a central
>> > > server. To
>>
>> > > avoid such problems where the central server isn't reachable you
>> > > better use a
>>
>> > > decentralized version control system like git.
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Hi,
>>
>> > i aggree. As bazaar and git user i have to say that i am really happy
>>
>> > with them and SVN seems to me step back. But if it will be SVN in the
>>
>> > end it will still be much better then CVS :)
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Radek
>>
>>
>>
>> Ok, i'm trying to convert the cvs repository to git right now.
>>
>> The last complete backup is from 2009-04-29 so everything committed
>>
>> after that day has to be applied again.
>
> I'd prefer SVN over CVS. I've been spoiled by the likes of Tortoise(SVN|CVS)
> over the years. To be honest and fair though, I know nothing of git so I
> would not be able to make a properly informed decision at this point in
> time, :)
>
> Deryk
> _______________________________________________
> Dotgnu-pnet mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dotgnu-pnet
>
>