[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?
From: |
edgar . soldin |
Subject: |
Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:59:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 |
On 29.02.2012 11:43, SanskritFritz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:07 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 29.02.2012 10:37, SanskritFritz wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:57 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> as this isn't the first time that listbody modding helped and i am also
>>>> interested in box.net anybody disagreeing in making the listbody host
>>>> aware, meaning switching known to work listbodies by host name?
>>>
>>> Host aware? Wouldn't it be better to make it webdav server-version aware
>>> rather?
>>>
>>
>> then we'd have to issue an initial request to the server just to determine
>> the server software, if it is chatty enough it'll tell us in the http
>> headers, but still have to be parsed properly. i am not into webdav, so i
>> don't know if there is a way to properly ask a server what software/version
>> it is in case the headers are useless.
>>
>> but seeing all these different implementations i'd bet that going by
>> hostname (say second level domainbased e.g. box.net) assuming they don't use
>> different implementations in their loadbalancing should be quite easy and
>> safe to implement.
>
> So you imagine the hosts list holding the exceptions to the default
> server behaviour?
right
>Because I'm afraid such list could otherwise grow
> pretty large with all the free and nonfree offerings around. Also, who
> would maintain such a list?
>
let's start small and see. if it get's bigger there is always the possibility
to externalize the listbodies into files, which are named like the host or such.
@ken: objections?
..ede
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, Bubba Wilson, 2012/02/28
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, SanskritFritz, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, edgar . soldin, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, SanskritFritz, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, edgar . soldin, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, SanskritFritz, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?,
edgar . soldin <=
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, Kenneth Loafman, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, SanskritFritz, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, Kenneth Loafman, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, Michael Terry, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, edgar . soldin, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, Ken Bass, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Duplicity-talk] Anyone using duplicity with box.net (webdavs)?, edgar . soldin, 2012/02/29