[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
From: |
Jason Rumney |
Subject: |
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs |
Date: |
23 Apr 2003 07:43:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Hi Ben, can you answer the following question for me?
A simple yes or no is sufficient, we are trying to determine whether
there is a simple explanation for XEmacs being noticeably faster than
GNU Emacs for network operations on Windows, or if it is due to a bug
in GNU Emacs.
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> >>>>> "Jason" == Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Jason> Does XEmacs implement non-blocking sockets on Windows?
>
> I don't know. Ask Ben Wing <address@hidden>. I know he's done a lot
> of work on processes, much of it intended to make processes work
> efficiently on Windows within the Unix-centric context of the rest of
> XEmacs. He may have done so; I'm sure it would be high on his
> priority list.
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, (continued)
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs,
Jason Rumney <=
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Ben Wing, 2003/04/25
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/22
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Frank Schmitt, 2003/04/22