[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs
From: |
David Abrahams |
Subject: |
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 06:38:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090018 (Oort Gnus v0.18) XEmacs/21.4 (Native Windows TTY Support (Windows), cygwin32) |
David Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:
> "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> From: David Abrahams <address@hidden>
>>> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:17:02 -0400
>>>
>>> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>> >>>>>> "David" == David Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:
>>> >
>>> > David> Now that I've got your attention, I should qualify that.
>>> > David> On Windows XP using GNUs and talking to an IMAP server,
>>> > David> it's way faster to use XEmacs than to use Gnu Emacs.
>>> >
>>> > Which version of XEmacs?
>>>
>>> The very latest I could download a few days ago.
>>
>> Was that a Cygwin build or a native Windows build?
>
> Native.
Uh, whoops! The XEmacs is Cygwin; my GNU Emacs is native.
(sorry)
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Kai Großjohann, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/04/22
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, David Abrahams, 2003/04/23
- Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/04/23
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Ben Wing, 2003/04/25
Re: Gnu Emacs way slower than XEmacs, Jason Rumney, 2003/04/22