|
From: | Herbert Euler |
Subject: | Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter? |
Date: | Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:07:18 +0800 |
From: David Kastrup <address@hidden> To: Miles Bader <address@hidden> CC: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden Subject: Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter? Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 01:43:25 +0200 And of course, consistency would do no harm. I have not sampled other limits, whether system-imposed or user-modifiable, so I can't vouch whether one or the other name seems more in line with other usage.
Maybe it's stupid: Is it possible to let the Lisp debugger register some variable so that once the Lisp interpreter see debugger has finished and 'max-specpdl-size' is different from what user set it will set 'max- specpdl-size' back, to keep the consistency of other applications of the term 'max'? (I think 'max' in other applications, at least in most other applications, is inherent.) Regards, Guanpeng Xu _________________________________________________________________Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |