[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:47:05 -0500 (CDT) |
Guanpeng Xu wrote:
I agree. I think it would be better if this information appears not only
in elisp manual, but also in docstring of 'max-specpdl-size' as well, if the
increment cannot be avoided.
It _already_ appears in the docstring of `max-specpdl-size':
You can safely use a value considerably larger than the default value,
if that proves inconveniently small. However, if you increase it too far,
Emacs could run out of memory trying to make the stack bigger.
You can customize this variable.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, (continued)
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/17
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/17
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Miles Bader, 2006/04/17
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Miles Bader, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, David Kastrup, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/19
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/19
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/19
Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/18