[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Guile in Emacs
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Guile in Emacs |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:52:14 -0700 |
> Common Lisp has sooo much to document. The Emacs Lisp Manual would
> get a lot bigger if it had to include the specs of so many functions.
The Elisp manual would not need to document things that are vanilla Common Lisp
(i.e. respect the CL standard). It could simply cross-reference the relevant CL
doc. The Elisp manual would need to document only extensions or departures from
the standard. It does not need to reproduce all of the existing CL
documentation.
- Re: Guile in Emacs, (continued)
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Thomas Lord, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Bruce Stephens, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2010/04/14
- RE: Guile in Emacs,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Helmut Eller, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/15
- RE: Guile in Emacs, Drew Adams, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Jeff Clough, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/15