[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Guile in Emacs

From: christian.lynbech
Subject: Re: Guile in Emacs
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:21:44 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.95 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

David> The manuals of an editor with a user-accessible extension language (with
David> Emacs, this is the case for Elisp but not for C) need to document this
David> extension language.

Of course, but there is no reason why this information cannot be split
across several manuals and having the CL parts be documented by
respectively the CL standard (eg. the hyperspec) and whatever other
documentation exists for the CL implementation chosen to host emacs.

The documentation must be accessible but this is not the same as the
emacs maintainers need to (re)write all of it nor that it necessarily
must be put into one particular (already somewhat unwieldy) document.

Christian Lynbech       | christian #\@ defun #\. dk
Hit the philistines three times over the head with the Elisp reference manual.
                                        - address@hidden (Michael A. Petonic)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]