Re: Shared libraries

[Andreas Rottmann]

Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

> Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I think we can get rid of the glib wrapset in the long run, since this
>> one will be provided by guile-gobject, so let's not worry about this.
>
> So everyone will use guile-gobject?
>
I think there should be one canonical place for the GLib bindings, and
as guile-gobject is the only place for GLib 2.0 bindings ATM, AFAIK
this seems natural to me.

> Also, have you done any tests to see what the overhead of dynamic
> wrapping is when compared to the older static style?  I presume the
> dynamic style is much more space efficient, but how does performance
> compare?  Do you expect any major differences?
>
I still have to run some benchmarks. Any proposals how to best test this?

Regards, Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | address@hidden      | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

This reality is really just a fucked-up dream -- Papa Roach