[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1?

From: Colin Walters
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1?
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:44:08 -0500

On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 15:34, Tom Lord wrote:
> I'm planning on making a release after finishing up the merge
> with the integration branch.
> It would be a slight change of plans, but one option is to 
> call that release "1.1".

That sounds pretty reasonable to me.  Robert and I discussed this a bit
on IRC yesterday, and he considered the umask issue a blocker.  

Personally...I would much rather have 1.1 out the door.  tla is stable
and pretty usable, but I think a lot of people hesitate to use a
revision control system with "pre" in the version...

> I think that the command-name and option changes have quieted pretty
> far down from a few weeks ago -- that was the big issue for 1.1.
> The divergence from the original 1.1 plan is that a few more might
> still follow it.

What other ones are you thinking of?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]