[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1?

From: Robert Collins
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1?
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:42:22 +1100

On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 08:14, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> Debian stable doesn't seem worth worrying about.  Debian testing is a
> more practical target.  Presumably other distributions would also be
> more keen to take something called 1.1.

the version # isn't the issue - the issue is that 1.1 isn't released yet
- it's still considered 'pre-release'.

> > Any objections?  Factual corrections about the debian process?
> i don't see any mention of bug #5554/#5635, which is a big issue for
> people relying on implicit naming for many files.  It also appears to
> have a relatively simple patch (in bug 5554).

I'll review this tonight.

GPG key available at: <>.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]