[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1?

From: Florian Weimer
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1?
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:11:24 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

Tom Lord wrote:

> One of the main reasons to maybe make the 1.1 release now is the
> debian release process.  There have been a number of incidental
> comments on #irc that naming a release 1.1 will cause it to show up in
> debian-stable sooner, which apparently there is some demand for.

ITYM unstable.  This is just the package maintainer's decision; there is
nothing in Debian's rules which would prevent him from shipping a
devo--1.1 version.

I'm pretty agnostic about the 1.1 label, but unless the tutorial is
up-to-date, I don't think it would be a good idea from a PR point of

> Any objections?  Factual corrections about the debian process?

The documentation question is not relevant for Debian at this point.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]