[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question
From: |
David Brown |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Mar 2004 09:16:00 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:46:32PM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
> I regard the renaming issue as an example of feedback between tools
> and decisions. I know it works well in arch so I rename stuff far
> more frequently than I would if arch couldn't hack it.
I've noticed that in arch-only projects, I tend to rename files, move
them to other directories, and whatnot, whenever it seems appropriate.
For work projects, where it is a complete pain (Perforce), I'm much more
reluctant to rename things, even though I track my branches with arch, I
know I'll have to eventually merge it into something that isn't nearly
as fond of the renames.
Dave
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, David Brown, 2004/03/10
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch/subversion comparison question, Miles Bader, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Rob Weir, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Jan Hudec, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question, Florian Weimer, 2004/03/15