[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees
From: |
Jani Monoses |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 16:58:53 +0300 |
>
> It should work. Aaron and I have been star-merging each other with
> reference for a couple days now.
>
Tried again and still no luck.Looked at star-merge did these modifications and
it seems to work...
Is this a bug and it worked so far only for branches tagged from the same
patch-level? It seems that x (the numer of pathes in Tom's branch in this
case 28) was not indexing anything and only base-0 was looked at?
I am not entirely sure why this change made a difference but I hope someone
will explain..
Jani
,l.diff
Description: Text Data
- [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, Jani Monoses, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, James Blackwell, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees,
Jani Monoses <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, James Blackwell, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, Jani Monoses, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, James Blackwell, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, Jani Monoses, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, James Blackwell, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, Jani Monoses, 2004/07/26