[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] feature request(?): file-history command.
From: |
Mikhael Goikhman |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] feature request(?): file-history command. |
Date: |
Fri, 13 May 2005 20:51:52 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On 12 May 2005 11:08:37 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>
> Fai has a couple of advantages:
> 1. it actually uses the modified-files header, instead of matching
> anything in the log. (e.g. if you write TODO in the log body)
> 2. it tracks renames
arch-perl (and its frontends) has additional ones:
3. tracks the history of both files and directories (correctly)
4. workarounds almost all cases caused by arch bugs with import log
(however there is no way to detect adding empty dir on import)
5. tries to do everything locally (f.e. "annotate" supports revlib and
does not do slow "get-changeset REV" to extract diffs when possible;
support for ~/.arch-cache (if present) will be added shortly too
6. support for "one_version", "no_continuation" and other options
7. support for tla and baz, >= 1.1
Regards,
Mikhael.
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] feature request(?): file-history command., Paul LeoNerd Evans, 2005/05/12
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] feature request(?): file-history command., Mikhael Goikhman, 2005/05/13
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: feature request(?): file-history command., Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/17