[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpl licensing
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: gpl licensing |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:56:27 +0100 (CET) |
"Without copyright law the GPL would be unenforceable.
It would also be unnecessary"
Such claims are not really true, without copyright law we would not
have any means to protect the rights of users. Copyright is a double
edged sword. Only with laws that explicitly ban non-free software
would the GPL become unnecessary.
- Re: gpl licensing, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, Aragorn, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, David Kastrup, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Aragorn, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, David Kastrup, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Aragorn, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, rjack, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, David Golden, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Aragorn, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, David Golden, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, David Golden, 2006/12/03
- Message not available
- Re: gpl licensing, David Kastrup, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, John Hasler, 2006/12/03
- Re: gpl licensing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/12/04