[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
hypothesis violation (was Re: [Heartlogic-dev] tentative plan)
From: |
Joshua N Pritikin |
Subject: |
hypothesis violation (was Re: [Heartlogic-dev] tentative plan) |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:51:10 +0530 |
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 01:50 -0500, William L. Jarrold wrote:
> See espec
> dicussion section of chapter about study 3. also conclusion chapter,
> maybe also disucssion section of chapter about study 2. think about
> how to use a flowchart to answer some of the explanations of those
> items
> that did not live up to hypothesis
I re-read those parts just now. The discussion of comments is mostly
confined to study #2. What I found in study #3 is a lot of discussion
of the fine points of the statistics and associated guesswork about
the cause of the inconsistent results.
I did not find a proposal for the kind of flow-chart study which I
want to do.
--
If you are an American then support http://fairtax.org
(Permanently replace 50,000+ pages of tax law with about 200 pages.)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part