[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond BNF
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond BNF |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:12:42 -0600 |
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 19:28 +0200, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I'll hack a bit on Nicolas' idea of using the output file from Bison as
> > a source for the stripped-down Yacc syntax. When I'm done, I'll submit
> > another try.
>
> However, if the idea is to put @comments in parser.yy, it would be
> better to process parser.yy directly with its comments, rather than
> parser.output.
I agree, but Yacc/Bison as written don't have a direct facility for
handling @comments. They could be included in a /* */ comment block,
but that seems like more deviation than it's worth.
It seems to me that unless/until Yacc/Bison gets expanded to allow for
@comments, I get the best results from parsing parser.output.
Carl
--
Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>
- Re: Lilypond BNF, (continued)
- Re: Lilypond BNF, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/07/26
- Re: Lilypond BNF, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/07/26
- Re: Lilypond BNF, Carl Sorensen, 2005/07/26
- Re: Lilypond BNF, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/07/26
- Re: Lilypond BNF, Carl Sorensen, 2005/07/26
- Re: Lilypond BNF, Carl Sorensen, 2005/07/27
- Re: Lilypond BNF, Juergen Reuter, 2005/07/27
- Re: Lilypond BNF, Carl Sorensen, 2005/07/27
- Re: Lilypond BNF, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/07/27
- Re: Lilypond BNF,
Carl Sorensen <=
Re: Lilypond BNF, Pedro Kröger, 2005/07/27