[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:29:26 +0200 |
Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 06:58 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Hmm, I suppose this would screw up the cross-references.
Not at all, cross-references are defined in macros.itexi.
> I guess we'll just expect users
> looking at a pdf tarball to open up "general.pdf" first.
We don't care so much about the name, as long as said PDF is easily
reachable from a HTML documentation central, i.e. Manuals page, I guess.
> More importantly, this screws up the "info lilypond" idea.
We have already foo -> lilypond-foo almost manual renaming for many
manuals, we can have one more renaming. My concern was about building
docs, not naming Info output.
> ... just a moment. *why* do we have a lilypond/ info dir being
> created?
Look for INFO_IMAGES_DIR stuff. BTW it's not a directory, it's a
symlink.
> Isn't that just because notation.tely contains
> @setfilename lilypond.info
> (IIRC)?
No, this is rather because we want images for Info docs to be in a
subdirectory of $(prefix)/share/info.
Cheers,
John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/02
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/03
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/03
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/03
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/03
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Carl Sorensen, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal,
John Mandereau <=
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Graham Percival, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Francisco Vila, 2009/08/04
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Till Paala, 2009/08/07
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Till Paala, 2009/08/07
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, Andrew Hawryluk, 2009/08/08
- Re: the "separate, but integrated" website proposal, John Mandereau, 2009/08/08