[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: broken links for "next section in reading order"

From: Francisco Vila
Subject: Re: broken links for "next section in reading order"
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 16:51:40 +0200

2010/5/21 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Francisco Vila <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 2010/5/21 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>>> There's an automatic tool to fill in menus if there's a
>>> @menu
>>> @end menu
>>> see the CG for details.  "scripts to aid doc work" or something like that.
>> I've tried it and doesn't work, menu is not filled with
>> @unnumberedsubsubsec names. Probably only @nodes are taken as menu
>> entries, as existing menus contain section names which have a @node
> err... yes.  My previous email was unclear: yes, we need a @node name.
>  In fact, our doc policy specifies that we must use @node names
> everywhere, for precisely this reason.  However, in some cases this
> *will* change the html splitting in a way that isn't appropriate.

My understanding (you know where does it come from :-) is that only
numbered sections produce splitting. So, no danger of new files
everywhere as long as nodes are unnumberedsubsubsec.

Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) ,

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]