[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH]: Fix issue 1096
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH]: Fix issue 1096 |
Date: |
Thu, 27 May 2010 19:42:08 -0600 |
On 5/27/10 2:58 PM, "Benjamin Peterson" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Carl Sorensen <c_sorensen <at> byu.edu> writes:
>> I saw the comment from David not as a suggestion to build an automated
>> process for feeding the erroneous strings, but as a one-time testing
>> suggestion. Hence my request for help.
>
> I'm not sure what the purpose would be for an error test in this case, since
> the
> patch is about preventing an error.
That's what I thought as well, but I think that David was feeling that there
was some need for more extensive testing to make sure that errors were
properly handled instead of segfaulting.
Thanks,
Carl
Re: [PATCH]: Fix issue 1096, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/05/27
Message not available