[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: follow-up to report 22
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: follow-up to report 22 |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:56:12 -0600 |
On 11/5/10 7:49 AM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 07:36:42AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> I don't think it's worth delaying 2.14 in order to debate either of these
>> questions. Can't we just note that the debate exists, perhaps add it to our
>> list of GLISS topics, and move on to getting 2.14 out?
>
> It's not a GLISS (syntax) topic; it's a GOP (general organization)
> topic. And it's already noted:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-10/msg00404.html
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/policy.html
>
> The formalizing of hackers is, appropriately enough, topic
> 3. Hackers A
>
Great! Let's move on, OK? If Valentin wants to patch the documentation,
then he can propose a patch. The same applies to anyone else who wants to
propose a patch.
Thanks,
Carl
- follow-up to report 22, Graham Percival, 2010/11/04
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/04
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/11/04
- Re: follow-up to report 22, David Kastrup, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Graham Percival, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, David Kastrup, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Graham Percival, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Graham Percival, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Carl Sorensen, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, David Kastrup, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Joe Neeman, 2010/11/05
- Re: follow-up to report 22, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/05