[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond too noisy on the cmd line
From: |
David Santamauro |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond too noisy on the cmd line |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Jan 2011 19:45:17 -0500 |
On Jan 2, 2011, at 9:47, "Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)" <address@hidden> wrote:
> You should consider using a proper logging framework with different
> logging levels.
>
That is a really good idea. There are a few gotchas that need addressing, for
example the use of ly:message to emit warnings and such, but I'll take a look
at a broader solution.
David
>
> On 1/2/11, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 02:25:57AM -0500, David Santamauro wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 10:19:18 +0000
>>> Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1074
>>>> Patches appreciated. Unfortunately I doubt that anything will
>>>> happen unless you personally work on it, but it's "on the books".
>>>
>>> Question: Should the be_verbose_global variable control this? I'm not
>>> sure a new command line argument is really needed as long as it is
>>> agreed upon what verbose is and isn't.
>>
>>> I added a be_quiet_global in my sandbox but reading the thread makes me
>>> think that simplification is needed and not an expansion.
>>
>> Since we already have a be_verbose_global variable, I can't
>> imagine much serious objection to having a be_quiet_global. My
>> initial guess would be that we want three different types of
>> output:
>> - verbose
>> - normal
>> - quiet
>>
>> However, this is definitely outside my depth.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - Graham
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>>
Re: lilypond too noisy on the cmd line, David Kastrup, 2011/01/01