lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: music function semantics


From: James Lowe
Subject: RE: music function semantics
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:01:36 +0000

Hello,

)-----Original Message-----
)From: address@hidden
)[mailto:address@hidden On
)Behalf Of David Kastrup
)Sent: 30 July 2011 17:03
)To: address@hidden
)Subject: Re: music function semantics
)
)Jan Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
)
)> 2011/7/29 James Lowe <address@hidden>:
)>>
)>> 29 July 2011 08:11 Jan Warchol wrote:
)>> )...ah, so it is possible to modify ties in a chord separately!  Do
)>> you realize )that i didn't know about it?
)>>
)>> Snippet for LSR?
)>
)> I tried to write it, and do you know what?  It doesn't work!  Very stupid.
)>
)> % if you apply this tweak to first note (c'), it works (tie gets
)> weird).  However, when applied to second note, it doesn't.
)> { < c' ~   g'-\tweak #'control-points #'((1 . -1) (3 . 0.6) (12.5 .
)> 0.6) (14.5 . -1)) ~ >   q }
)
)If you take a look at the output of
)
)\displayMusic { < c'-\tweak #'control-points #'((1 . -1) (3 . 0.6) (12.5 .
)0.6) (14.5 . -1)) ~   g'-\tweak #'control-points #'((1 . -1) (3 . 0.6) (12.5 .
)0.6) (14.5 . -1)) ~ >   q }
)
)you'll see that it is not the fault of the parser.  The music expression still
)carries the respective information.
)
This is a bit too low level for me now.

So is this a bug or something else? (I.e do we need a tracker item or not?) and 
can we tie individual notes within in a chord or not?

?:)

James

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]