[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities

From: James Lowe
Subject: RE: GOP-PROP 8: issue priorities
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 22:12:26 +0000


)usually it's longer).  I noticed that when i have too many issues open
)(including Frog's issues which i 'supervise' and upload to Rietveld), i'm
)getting confused; i cannot remember what's going on where (because
)discussions last for a long time) and so on.
)Therefore i have to wait until some issues are closed - currently i'm not
)doing anything because i don't want more mess in my mind :)

Which is why tracker items are important for issues and why I open a tracker 
for a Rietveld issue another dev has created if I think it is going to be 
significant, or if I have had to run more than one reg test or if it has more 
than half a dozen updates from the dev - which implies it is important enough 
to warrant a lot of time. 

It probably annoys some because they then feel obligated but this is where I 
think GOP 8 blurs over to GOP 7. I get a bit exhausted keeping track of it all 
which is a negative thing, and I know that devs would get a bit exhausted 
creating 'two' issues (Tracker and Rietveld) and may then feel they have to 
update both now it seems I am making more work for them when in fact I am just 
trying to keep track of it to help and Rietveld is abysmal for this.

We don't have a GOP for 'isn't there a better way to keep track of issues AND 
upload patches' I see though.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]