[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pushing patches to staging
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Pushing patches to staging |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:08:59 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:56:38PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> And you can't push to master anyway without having rebased (or merged,
> which one does not usually want to see upstream) your development branch
> to its current state, so I have trouble understanding your problem.
You're assuming that we have achieved moderate git competency. We
haven't.
I (optimistically) think that we don't need to require moderate
git competency. I (optimistically) think that it is possible to
create a set of instructions that can be copy&paste'd to do
whatever we need to do.
I really hope that my optimism is well-founded.
> But I do think there is some agreement that we are considering the
> master branch push experiment a reliably recurring failure. And the
> consequences get more expensive the more developers are working on
> Lilypond.
+1
> Going through staging with an automated test procedure is going to help.
+1
> If you have a better suggestion how to deal with the "master gets broken
> frequently" phenomenon, go ahead.
I can't think of any other solution that's appealing. (the main
"other solution" is to revoke git access for X weeks for anybody
who breaks master, but since something like 80% of our development
effort comes from people who break master (including myself), this
would backfire badly)
The only problem is to develop a series of simple commands to do
this task.
- Graham
- Pushing patches to staging, Phil Holmes, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, Graham Percival, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, Graham Percival, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, Graham Percival, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/12
Re: Pushing patches to staging, Peekay Ex, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, Carl Sorensen, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, Carl Sorensen, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/12
- Re: Pushing patches to staging, Carl Sorensen, 2011/11/12
Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/12
Re: Pushing patches to staging, Phil Holmes, 2011/11/13
Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/13
Re: Pushing patches to staging, Carl Sorensen, 2011/11/13
Re: Pushing patches to staging, Phil Holmes, 2011/11/15
Re: Pushing patches to staging, David Kastrup, 2011/11/15