[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (i
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:53:17 -0400 |
On Aug 17, 2015, at 10:32 , address@hidden wrote:
>
> The problem I have is that it's hard to remember the order of arguments.
> So I decided to use assignment-like order. A reasonably good name
> would have been just \accepts but that is already taken.
\accepts could be renamed if it would help, right? (I’m at work and can’t
spend time brainstorming, but I couldn’t resist mentioning it.)
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden), paulwmorris, 2015/08/17
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/08/17
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden),
Dan Eble <=
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/08/17
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/08/17
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden), paulwmorris, 2015/08/18
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden), dak, 2015/08/18
- Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden), paulwmorris, 2015/08/18