Re: \acceptance for letting one context-def share accepts for another (issue 260800043 by address@hidden)

[Dan Eble]

> On Aug 17, 2015, at 18:48 , address@hidden wrote:
> 
> On 2015/08/17 14:53:22, dan_faithful.be wrote:
>> On Aug 17, 2015, at 10:32 , mailto:address@hidden wrote:
>> >
>> > The problem I have is that it's hard to remember the order of
> arguments.
[…]
> Maybe \accept-equally "MyStaff" "Staff" ?  Still cumbersome but less
> awkward, and "equally" is more compatible with the new-old order than
> "like".

\accept-equally sounds like it makes the two context types interchangeable; 
would it make sense to implement that instead?  (Maybe by running the current 
algorithm once in each order?)  Then this problem disappears.

If you really want a one-way relationship, I can’t think of a single word that 
makes the order obvious.  \accept X \as Y seems obvious.  Maybe \accept X = Y.
— 
Dan