[Ltib] Re: add -DZ_PREFIX

[hong zhang]

Stuart,

Yes. 20070128 is kernel 2.6.19.2. Another one is
20071008 is kernel 2.6.22 that I am not using.

1. I do not find pkg-config in rootf/usr/bin in
20070128.

2. directfb.pc and lite.pc are in /usr/lib/pkgconfig.
   inside directfb.pc, Cflags=-I/usr/include/direcfb
   but inside lite.pc, Cflags does not have 
   -I/usr/include/lite. This causes build error for 
   DFBTerm depends on lite.

How do I make lite.pc includes 
Cflags=-I/usr/include/lite where lite header files
sit?

Where can I get pkg-config?

---henry
--- Stuart Hughes <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi Henry,
> 
> Do you have the date/identification tag for the iso
> so I can find out if
> it contains the pkg_config updates.  Maybe that
> stuff still needs some
> work?
> 
> I am trying to get an up to date merge out to
> Savannah/bitshrine in the
> next few weeks.  I've been busy on other project,
> but I'm back on it
> now.
> 
> Any help and contributions you can make would be
> appreciated.
> 
> Regards, Stuart
> 
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 10:50 -0700, hong zhang wrote:
> > Stuart,
> > 
> > I am using freescale one sio. Download from
> freescale
> > website. Yes. I have problem to add new packages.
> For
> > example, adding LiTE and will be used by DFBTerm.
> LiTE
> > header files locate in rootfs/usr/include/lite and
> > DFBTerm could not find it.
> > 
> > Also, I am thinking I can do some contribution
> onltib
> > packages upgrade.
> > 
> > ---henry
> > 
> > --- Stuart Hughes <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Henry,
> > > 
> > > Are you using the LTIB from an iso image, if so
> what
> > > version? or are you
> > > using the version from bitshrine/savannah?  The
> > > reason I ask is that I
> > > pending merge out to bitshrine/savannah that
> makes
> > > pkg_config work
> > > properly in a cross compiled environment and
> > > possibly that will help you
> > > (you won't need to specify the pkg_config files
> on
> > > configure line).  If
> > > you have a recent Freescale ISO it will already
> have
> > > these updates.
> > > 
> > > I didn't understand your question about Z_PREFIX
> ?
> > > 
> > > Regards, Stuart
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 09:45 -0700, hong zhang
> wrote:
> > > > Stuart,
> > > > 
> > > > After adding
> > > >
> LIBPNG_CONFIG="$(HOST_DIR)/bin/libpng12-config" \
> > > >  and DirectFB build successfully with
> > > > --with-gfxdrivers=none. But still have error
> > > without
> > > > --with-gfxdrivers=none.
> > > > 
> > > > Why do you think Z_PREFIX will be turned on
> > > default?
> > > > 
> > > > ---henry
> > > > 
> > > > --- Stuart Hughes <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hi Henry,
> > > > > 
> > > > > LTIB will find the headers in rootfs in
> > > preference
> > > > > to the toolchain.
> > > > > 
> > > > > To add this flag, it would probably work by
> > > changing
> > > > > the spec file to:
> > > > > 
> > > > > CFLAGS="-DZ_PREFIX" \
> > > > > ./configure --enable-shared --host=$CFGHOST
> > > > > --build=%{_build} \
> > > > > ....
> > > > > 
> > > > > What does this flag do, and do you know why
> the
> > > > > things it turns on in
> > > > > zconf.h are not enabled by default?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Regards, Stuart
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 15:27 -0700, hong
> zhang
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > Stuart,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I want to add -DZ_PREFIX to turn on inside
> > > > > zconf.h.
> > > > > > Where should I add  -DZ_PREFIX  in
> > > DirectFB.spec?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > When I upgrade zlib and I found library
> header
> > > > > files
> > > > > > in toolchain is not upgraded and rootfs is
> > > > > upgraded.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ---henry
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best
> spam
> > > > > protection around 
> > > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > protection around 
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com