Re: [Ltib] libXt "failed dependencies"

[Stuart Hughes]

Hi Alan,

I can explain the difference in behaviour.  When running -m scdeploy, 
the rpm file in installed with a "fabricated" spec file that has:

Autoreqprov     : no

This effectively disables the provides/requires checks that happen in a 
normal run.  This is something you would want during package development.

The real question is why you're failing this dependency.  Run:

ls -l rootfs/libc*

You should see libc.so.6 in there and it should be a link to a real file 
(for example: libc-2.3.6.so).  If it is not there, then base_libs has 
not been installed.  If it is, then for some reason base_libs has not 
inserted this provide into the rpm database.  You can check with:
rpm --root `pwd`/rootfs -q base_libs --provides | grep libc.so

Regards, Stuart


Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
> Hi Stuart, (this is not devaju this time :)
>
> There is some issue compiling libXt, it always fail when compiling
> automatically by LTIB, but works when compiling by "./ltib -p libXt -m
> (prep, scbuild,scdeploy).
>
> This is the error message:
>
> Build time for libXt: 71 seconds
>
> sudo /opt/ltib/usr/bin/rpm --root /home/ltib/rootfs --dbpath
> /var/lib/rpm -e --allmatches --nodeps --noscripts --define '_tmppath
> /tmp/ltib' libXt 2>/dev/null
> sudo /opt/ltib/usr/bin/rpm --root /home/ltib/rootfs --dbpath
> /var/lib/rpm --prefix / --ignorearch -ivh --force --excludedocs
> --noscripts --define '_tmppath /tmp/ltib'
> /home/ltib/rpm/RPMS/arm/libXt-1.0.4-5.arm.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
>         libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)   is needed by libXt-1.0.4-5
>         libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)   is needed by libXt-1.0.4-5
>
>
> f_buildrpms() returned an error, exiting
> traceback:
>  main:555
>
>
> Started: Mon Jul 13 14:29:56 2009
> Ended:   Mon Jul 13 15:00:08 2009
> Elapsed: 1812 seconds
>
>
> Build Failed