[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15
From: |
Thomas Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15 |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Dec 2000 07:59:52 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 01:36:49PM +0900, Henry Nelson wrote:
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pg scm 842 Jan 6 2000 es.po
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pg scm 3296 Sep 13 1999 it.po
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pg scm 261 Jan 6 2000 ko.po
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pg scm 261 Jan 6 2000 no.po
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pg scm 261 Jan 6 2000 pl.po
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 pg scm 826 Jan 6 2000 pt.po
>
> None of these are valid *.po files, and IMO should be removed.
they're all valid (that only requires that they be compilable), but if you read
the changes for dev.15, you would notice that they're not in the source anymore
(cleaning the breakout directory sometimes takes a reminder).
--
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, pg, 2000/12/22
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Thomas Dickey, 2000/12/22
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, pg, 2000/12/22
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Thomas Dickey, 2000/12/22
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4 & SSL, Philip Webb, 2000/12/22
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4 & SSL, Thomas Dickey, 2000/12/22
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4 & cookie b/f, Philip Webb, 2000/12/22
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Atsuhito Kohda, 2000/12/22
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Henry Nelson, 2000/12/25
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15,
Thomas Dickey <=
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Henry Nelson, 2000/12/28
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Henry Nelson, 2000/12/28
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Henry Nelson, 2000/12/28