[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15
From: |
Henry Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15 |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Dec 2000 11:33:44 +0900 (JST) |
> > 2) What was _done_ was NOT what was discussed on the list. Both Morten
> > Bo Johansen and I agreed that the complete *.po files should only go
> > into _releases_, not into the development bundles. The "beef" about
>
> it's the only way that was suggested to make them maintainable.
^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What does "the only way" mean, putting in the complete *.po file? What,
when and whose suggestion are you referring to? I thought "maintainable"
only meant compilable to you.
> I already did that (the stubs in the tar file are from some trash on
"Stubs?" There isn't a single _stub file_ in there!
Happy New Year. (Looking more and more like the last for Lynx.)
__Henry
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, (continued)
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Atsuhito Kohda, 2000/12/22
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Henry Nelson, 2000/12/25
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Henry Nelson, 2000/12/28
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15,
Henry Nelson <=
Re: lynx-dev 2.8.4dev.15, Henry Nelson, 2000/12/28