[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?
From: |
Steve Mosher |
Subject: |
Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2000 11:03:52 -0300 |
On Wed, 17 May 2000, joost diepenmaat wrote:
> I think it would make some pretty cool stuff a lot easier. ( by the way,
> i'm still
> working at an update for my tb-303 buzz-module, and if the gearlib is
> going to be
> developed, i would be happy to donate some of the stuff from there, for
> instance
> the filter and adr (no sustain, but with accent))
This has got me thinking... a formulaic envelope/signal generator
would be really neat... and nicely scaleable. Would anyone use something
like this? It's powerful, but you have to know what you're doing to use it.
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, (continued)
- [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Ross Litscher, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Gary Richardson, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/14
- RE: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, Unkargherth, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, joost diepenmaat, 2000/05/17
- OT: Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, Matt Stanton, 2000/05/17
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?,
Steve Mosher <=
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, David O'Toole, 2000/05/17