|
From: | Joe Cooper |
Subject: | Re: "floe" != mispelled "flow" |
Date: | Sun, 17 Aug 2003 12:03:26 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030727 Thunderbird/0.1 |
David Philippi wrote:
Am Son, 2003-08-17 um 18.28 schrieb Jarno Elonen:My dictionary reads "jäälautta: [ice] floe", so how about adding the "ice" before the "floe"? When I first saw the word in an earlier version of Pingus, I actually thought it was a typo, too.According to some dictionaries I've got access to the ice is already part of the meaning of floe. Perhaps someone with english as native tongue could shed more light on the matter?
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=floeWherein the definition of floe is given as "an ice floe". I thought there were rules against defining a word with itself. ;-)
Just "floe" is fine from my perspective, but "ice floe" isn't offensive either. (I'm a native english speaker.)
-- Joe Cooper <address@hidden> Web caching appliances and support. http://www.swelltech.com
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |