[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sets
From: |
Ken Cline |
Subject: |
Re: sets |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:02:01 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
> ... It's fixed for the next release.
See what I mean!
> In the mean time, probably the easiest thing to do is go
> ahead and use the -count method. Note that it isn't in
> the Set protocol, so if you say "id <Set> set", the
> compiler should remind you about the problem.
On a related topic (but probably not necessary for the
`count'/`getCount')...
I'm not sure if its general knowledge, but Swarm has macros
for identifying which version is being built against. See
<defobj/version.h>. There's also a string constant defined
in <swarmconfig.h>. Of course, I'd try to avoid using them
if at all possible.
Marcus, any caveats to using those macros?
Ken.
_________________________________________________________
Ken Cline address@hidden
SAIC VOICE (410) 571-0413
Annapolis, MD FAX (301) 261-8427
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
- sets, Jonathan Impett, 1999/06/25
- Re: sets, Ken Cline, 1999/06/25
- Re: sets, Jonathan Impett, 1999/06/25
- Re: sets, Ken Cline, 1999/06/25
- Re: sets, Marcus G. Daniels, 1999/06/25
- Re: sets,
Ken Cline <=
- Re: sets, Marcus G. Daniels, 1999/06/25