On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:44:53 -0600 (MDT), Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote: 21.2.50, straight from the CVS HEAD. Compiled on Windows XP with Visual Studio. On my machine/configuration the prob
I agree. I don't think the doc strings need changing. When I piped in on this thread, I viewed it as a thread about the UI, specifically for beginers. I see very little in the UI which makes these va
Yes, except that the condition on this keymap is (or (eq cua-enable-cua-keys t) cua--last-region-shifted) Could you make a new variable to control this keymap, and set it from post-command-hook? Lik
That is exactly what I've done now. I set a total of 5 such variables in the post-command-hook to control the various cua related keymaps. The problem with this approach is that -- in some cases -- a
Fixed, thanks. I take it with these comments that you are satisfied with the rest of the patch? I don't really wish to debate this in depth, since I sense this has the potential to develop into a lon
- Rectangle highlighting - rectangles are not confined to actual line lengths, e.g. if the buffer contains lines like this (X marks the position of the cursor aaaaaaaaa bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb cccccccccccc d
Such modeline-less windows may be useful for other purposes, so we should try adding them to see what use people can find for them. I believe we already support windows without mode-lines. For the UI
It is not logical or good practice to jump straight to "Take out that change" without thinking about the problem or looking for rejectionary alternatives. When a change was made to address one proble
It would be good to think about how such a thing could also be used for things like ECB where they need to be able to impose some structure on the window layout and make sure that the user does not
URGENT POSTERS FROM YOUR FILES? here is the solution. Ready 24 HOURS from now in Europe, USA and Canada. Pixart studio's poster service allows you to make large prints straight from your files easily
I edited out the details but here it is: eval: (c-add-style "StyleX" (quote ((c-basic-offset . 4) (c-offsets-alist (label . *) ...))) t) This suggests we add a feature where a function can be marked
This sounds like a good feature. Well, I still need to do (put 'c-add-style 'safe-local-eval-function t) in my .emacs, but that's easier than writing my own hook function. Works for me too. Thanks. T
The aim should be to use a numbering scheme which does not require us to change the numbers once we have decided on the number for the next "major" release. And we should be able to make that decisio
Personally, just for what it's worth, I've been enabling eval only for certain files I know I want, according to their filename. (By re-running hack-local-variables in find-file-hooks with enable-loc
With our UK National Calls costing as little as 1.8p per minute! we can save your company a fortune! That's less than half the "BT choices 1" rate, and about a quarter of the price of the BT standard
I'm not at all surprised, but that's not the point. You're one of the people I expected actually to understand what such changes entail practically when it comes to a merge, but it wasn't directed ju
I had written up a reply earlier, and Emacs crashed in the display code, though I haven't figured out why yet. I wonder if it's a sign... Yes, "but". It's tedious work, whoever does it, and whichever
I think that 99% of the time, the control-buffer list will only have one entry anyway, and it's obviously harmless to `default' in _that_ case! I also think it's a good idea to worry about the common
I don't know. I don't like programs that know better than I what I should be doing. Note also that if you have 2 buffers, the order of ediff sessions in which they are involved might be different. T