Hi Ihor, Thanks for looking into this. Well, "not defined" is strong, I'd say. There is no exposed option. But the behavior used to be regular, and "do the right thing" (OK, you may wish to debate th
You can still use org-meta-return at your own risk if you upgrade to the latest Org mode. Just hide the warning message that is now displayed in place of the error. The reason org-meta-return and som
Note: actually, reading that Reddit thread again, it appears that multiple persons were doing this and they regret loosing the use of org functions in non-org buffers so much that they decided to pin
Hi Ihor, Thank you for your reply and your explanations: very useful to learn how the system works 🙂 Prior to org 9.7, I used to use `org-meta-return` everywhere to nicely add elements to a list.
This is just a reference to the commit that introduced the explicit error. Do note that the error got downgraded to a warning in a more recent development version of Org mode. But the warning still i
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback Your bu
Sure. But I want to implement more generic feature. See the attached patch. The variable has been moved to a different file. C-h v not working is an Emacs bug. * lisp/org-fold.el (org-fold-catch-invi
AFAIU, :pin should be the right way that will not break updates. This is because list-packages is not used by Doom. list-packages is a built-in Vanilla Emacs package manager, while Doom uses straight
Hi again, Thanks for your help & pointers. Yes I agree, the problem must come from Doom's config (the commit version it uses seems 24k+ commits behind your HEAD!!). I reported the problem directly to
I am using Vanilla Emacs. Note that Doom is known for carelessly advising some Org functions and can sometimes break things. Such issues should be reported to Doom developers. There is no such Org ve
Hi again, Thanks for your answer and sorry for the duplicate. I would be glad to help find if/where is the bug. '((default . t)). Just in case. Yes indeed. I had it right in my config. I made the mis
It is https://list.orgmode.org/41f10572-03d0-8c7a-341a-26c0315753d0@alolise.org/ and it is not listed in updates.orgmode.org because your bug report has never been confirmed. I recommend using https:
Hi, I thought I already reported this bug, but I cannot find it anymore in the mailing list archives (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=org-meta-return&submit=Search%21&idxname=e
Greetings. The following happens with the latest version of the stable branch and the latest version of the master branch. Consider the following org file: 1. Some text [fn:: foo] 2. 3. with items Th
[...] This looks like a Frankenorg, there is no such code in Org 9.2.6. You may want to double-check your Org installation, you are probably mixing old and new libraries.
Hello, Many thanks for the reply. Please find the backtrace attached. This variable org-enable-table-editor has been removed in org v.9.1., which is stated explicitly in the release notes for v.9.1:
Hello, I don't think this would be a sufficient fix, because the buffer can be narrowed and, yet, showing the end of the file. Anyway, I don't think this final newline is needed. I removed it. This s