[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?
|
From: |
Kang Tin LAI |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Oct 2002 23:09:15 +0800 |
> > IMHO the "naked" function is simply broken code. Unfortunately there is no
> > "No Return" attribute implemented for GCC (well, there is, but it has never
> > made it into the GCC source) which is what you really want. I too wrote an
>
> Why it has never made it?
>
Up to the date, it should be only 4 people demand this. I have to understand it
is a difficulty to take care all situation of demand.
But, why open source? One is that everyone who may change the code whatever they
want to fit their needs. ;)
--
---
Kang Tin LAI <address@hidden>
-----
avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org
- [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, Tvrtko A. Ursulin, 2002/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, a . doesschate, 2002/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, Larry Barello, 2002/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, Kang Tin LAI, 2002/10/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, Larry Barello, 2002/10/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, Kang Tin LAI, 2002/10/23
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, Kang Tin LAI, 2002/10/23