[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] char arrays not being initilized
From: |
Chris Baugher |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] char arrays not being initilized |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Oct 2002 19:27:11 -0500 (CDT) |
Yeah, I brought this up awhile ago. AFAIK it hasn't ever been fixed. I
could attempt to track down the problem but it would take a year and a
half.
C|
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Lorne Gutz wrote:
> If I define a char array like....
> char test[] = "this is a test";
>
> The space for the array is allocated but the initilization
> is never done properly. I can read or write to and element
> of that array eg test[3] = 'f'; and everythis is fine.
>
> Presently I am using gcc-3.2 on LINUX. I have rebuild
> my cross compiler as suggested in the latest gcc avr-libc-20020203.
> Earlier I was using gcc-3.0.3 and had the same results.
>
> Now the weird thing is that a system was put together on an old
> NT box and everything worked fine!!!!
>
> I have seen this problem discribed here before but I don't
> ever recall seeing and answer.
>
> I have spend some time digging into this problem and it seems
> that it relates to the wrong registers being set up when the data is
> copied into the array. I tried it with a strcpy() with the same
> results. I have looked at the machine code that gets produced
> but not too sure of just what is wrong.
>
> So were I stand now is,......has someone else found a
> solution for this problem, or should I keep digging???
>
>
> Lorne
>
>
>
> avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org
>
avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org
- [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, Tvrtko A. Ursulin, 2002/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, a . doesschate, 2002/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, Larry Barello, 2002/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, Kang Tin LAI, 2002/10/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, Larry Barello, 2002/10/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, Kang Tin LAI, 2002/10/23
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?, Kang Tin LAI, 2002/10/23