[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [avr-gcc-list] Next version of winavr!!!

From: Derick Schoonbee
Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] Next version of winavr!!!
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 11:20:23 +0200

vim (& make & midnight commander) is good ... even on W2K&XP ... mind you I do not do any 'production' stuff .. surely nice to have a common ground accross OSes & target processors ...

From: "Brian Cuthie" <address@hidden>
To: "'Dave Hansen'" <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>
Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] Next version of winavr!!!
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 17:31:25 -0400

Well, clearly you haven't used a good IDE, or you didn't know how to use
it. Lots of production code is developed using IDEs. Nearly every
application for every desktop platform (we're talking the 99% of the
market held by MS/Apple, not the Linux/Unix world) is developed in an
IDE. Most commercial desktop applications are orders of magnitude more
complex than any of the embedded stuff that gets done.

An IDE does offer an additional level of abstraction, and many people
are understandably reluctant to begin using a new one (me included,
sometimes). But more often than not, learning the new tool pays off in


-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Hansen [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 4:54 PM
To: address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden
Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] Next version of winavr!!!


I could say that "good IDE" is an oxymoron, but that'd be too harsh.
most IDEs make it easy to do simple things.  They're especially useful
get example code up and running quickly.  But they fall apart when
a little.  I find them (for the most part) unsuitable for a production
environment.  Furthermore, everyone's IDE is different from everyone
  If you have several tool sets from several vendors targeting several
micros, you have to master each of them.



Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]