[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A request to add information on gprofng

From: Ruud van der Pas
Subject: Re: A request to add information on gprofng
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 11:47:08 +0000

Hi Nick,

> Makes sense to me.


> No - you would be the first. :-)

:-) We could do some trailblazing here. If it works out well, others
may want to follow.

> Well unless you count the online documentation which is really just
> an HTML formatted copy of the .texi files found in the sources.

I saw this too.

We do have an HTML formatted directory for the gprofng user guide as well,
but perhaps we should include it with the major update I plan to do
after my vacation (in the second half of August). I've already started
working on this.

> You can do either.  But I am totally OK with you having a sub-directorty
> below the sourceware binutils main web directory.

That is awesome and I think Kurt will agree :-)

Thanks very much, Nick!

Kind regards, Ruud

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]