[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How about simply include files?

From: Mathieu Bruneau
Subject: Re: How about simply include files?
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 17:52:25 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1

Sven Luther wrote:

On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 10:43:16AM +1100, Andrew Clausen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:57:07AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
If it fails, i have in the past proposed to open an alioth project,
and have the parted source in a subversion or arch repository there.
I have never used either, but have a mild preference for arch.

I have never used arch, but am using subversion for ocaml related
packages in debian. I hear arch is nicer because it allows for separate
remote repositories and such, a bit like bitkeeper.

That said, there may also be dangers of going from a single repository a
la CVS or subversion, to a dispersed one for arch or bitkeeper.


Sven Luther

Due to the small amount of "active" developper on parted I personnally don't think dispersing the code would be a good thing at the moment... But it's just a point of view

Nice thing for the project on alioth!

aka ROunofF


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]