Re: How about simply include files?

[Stewart Smith]

On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 10:43, Andrew Clausen wrote:
> I have never used either, but have a mild preference for arch.
> 
> What does everyone else think?

After much swearing, some handholding and reading a few sets of docs
(also thinking a bit) i've actually gotten my head around a few parts of
arch (the tla implementation). It's quite nice - has the bits of bk i
want, and it's free!

the whole distributed thing and easy mirrors rock.

subversion fixes up a few of the problems of CVS - but the arch approach
seems to be nicer. just be aware that 1/2 the people are quite helpful,
and the other 1/2 just want to abuse you for "not reading the tutorial"
- when really you have, about 3 times and just want help on how to do
something "simple".

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part