[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits)
From: |
Dennis Leeuw |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits) |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:44:47 +0200 |
If someone could send me a copy of the 'sources' of the pages I can see what
I can do.
Dennis
"M. Grabert" wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Dennis Leeuw wrote:
>
> > "Chris B. Vetter" wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:24:37 +0200
> > > Björn Gohla <b.gohla@gmx.de> wrote:
> > > > well then, somebody knowledgeable will have to wave the flag and
> > > > write a good article, the aforementioned magazines regularly publish
> > > > outside contributions.
> > >
> > > How about a translation of Dennis' article on
> > > http://lwn.net/daily/gnustep.php3 ?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Gregory and I am writting a somewhat larger document about GNUstep, more
> > in the style of Apples Mac OS X System Overview. Maybe we could do a
> > pre-release so people could steal and rob and translate. Let me know if
> > people have a need for it.
> >
> > Dennis
>
> BTW, what about GNUstep man-pages ?
> People who want to programm GNUstep should have good manuals,
> and most people without OpenStep expirience don't have the
> OPENSTEP library ...
> Okay, this is something really time-wasting, and it has
> lower prioriy, but it's important to think about it!
>
> BTW,
> I think the OPENSTEP library was one of the best manual pages
> ever. Every single class was perfectly described and you could
> even get some hints how it was implemented (if you read it
> carefully).
> MFC docs are crap, MSDN is a little bit better.
> But even the MacOS X documentation is not that good anymore!
>
> sersn max
dleeuw.vcf
Description: Card for Dennis Leeuw
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), (continued)
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), M. Grabert, 2001/06/22
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/22
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), M. Grabert, 2001/06/22
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/22
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), Adam Fedor, 2001/06/22
- Re[3]: gnustep compared to other toolkits), Manuel Guesdon, 2001/06/23
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits),
Dennis Leeuw <=
- Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, M. Grabert, 2001/06/22
- Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/22
- Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, Dennis Leeuw, 2001/06/22
- Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, Philippe C.D. Robert, 2001/06/23
- Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/25
- Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2001/06/21
Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, Francesco Abbate, 2001/06/21