Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits)

[Chris B . Vetter]

On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 21:46:06 +0200 (CEST)
"M. Grabert" <xam@grabert.net> wrote:
> no, time-wasting!
> because Apple allready has a great documentation about
> OpenStep and the best thing would be a GPL'd Apple
> docu ... everthing else is time-consuming and most propable
> not as good as the original ...

This will almost certainly never happen.

> > > lower prioriy, but it's important to think about it!
> > Man-Pages? Or do you mean HTML ?
> > Gosh, writing Man-Pages is a pain-in-the-you-know-where...
> don't care. But I think HTML would be better! Moreover GNU says
> man is dead.

Don't think so, but HTML would be quicker if Classes are cross-linked.

> > Can't say that for they Foundation- and AppKit-PDFs ... they are
> > just GREAT ... and HUGH :-P
> I was talking about the Library shipped with MacOS X Server.
> It's like Next's docu, but just cut off the best pieces!
> I think they are not as exactly and specific as the Next docu.

Ah, IC. Don't have MacOS X, but still got the NeXT Docu, which indeed
is great, IMHO.

-- 
Chris