discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[3]: gnustep compared to other toolkits)


From: Manuel Guesdon
Subject: Re[3]: gnustep compared to other toolkits)
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:41:19 +0200 (CEST)

On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:59:02 -0600 Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com> wrote:

 >| "Chris B. Vetter" wrote:
 >| > 
 >| >> > > Gosh, writing Man-Pages is a pain-in-the-you-know-where...
 >| > > don't care. But I think HTML would be better! Moreover GNU says
 >| > > man is dead.
 >| > 
 >| > Don't think so, but HTML would be quicker if Classes are cross-linked.
 >| 
 >| GNUstep class documentation is written in an SGML format called gsdoc. 
 >| It can be (and is) translated to HTML - see base/Documentation/gsdoc.
 >| Submissions welcome ;-)

Some times ago, I've added some code to gsdoc to make Class,... cross-refs.
You can also use the program which generate .gsdoc files from .m/.h files.

See http://www.gnustepweb.org/TDocs for an exemple of generated html pages.

Manuel

--
______________________________________________________________________
Manuel Guesdon - OXYMIUM <mguesdon@oxymium.net>
14 rue Jean-Baptiste Clement  -  93200 Saint-Denis  -  France
Tel: +33 1 4940 0999  -  Fax: +33 1 4940 0998




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]