[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[3]: gnustep compared to other toolkits)
From: |
Manuel Guesdon |
Subject: |
Re[3]: gnustep compared to other toolkits) |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:41:19 +0200 (CEST) |
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:59:02 -0600 Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com> wrote:
>| "Chris B. Vetter" wrote:
>| >
>| >> > > Gosh, writing Man-Pages is a pain-in-the-you-know-where...
>| > > don't care. But I think HTML would be better! Moreover GNU says
>| > > man is dead.
>| >
>| > Don't think so, but HTML would be quicker if Classes are cross-linked.
>|
>| GNUstep class documentation is written in an SGML format called gsdoc.
>| It can be (and is) translated to HTML - see base/Documentation/gsdoc.
>| Submissions welcome ;-)
Some times ago, I've added some code to gsdoc to make Class,... cross-refs.
You can also use the program which generate .gsdoc files from .m/.h files.
See http://www.gnustepweb.org/TDocs for an exemple of generated html pages.
Manuel
--
______________________________________________________________________
Manuel Guesdon - OXYMIUM <mguesdon@oxymium.net>
14 rue Jean-Baptiste Clement - 93200 Saint-Denis - France
Tel: +33 1 4940 0999 - Fax: +33 1 4940 0998
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), (continued)
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/27
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), M. Grabert, 2001/06/28
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/28
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), M. Grabert, 2001/06/29
- Re: GNUstep version number(s) (was: Re: GNUstep article (was: Re:gnustep compared to other toolkits)), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/29
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), M. Grabert, 2001/06/22
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/22
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), M. Grabert, 2001/06/22
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/22
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), Adam Fedor, 2001/06/22
- Re[3]: gnustep compared to other toolkits),
Manuel Guesdon <=
- Re: GNUstep article (was: Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits), Dennis Leeuw, 2001/06/22
- Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, M. Grabert, 2001/06/22
- Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/22
- Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, Dennis Leeuw, 2001/06/22
- Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, Philippe C.D. Robert, 2001/06/23
- Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, Chris B . Vetter, 2001/06/25
- Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2001/06/21
Re: gnustep compared to other toolkits, Francesco Abbate, 2001/06/21