[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??
From: |
Chris B. Vetter |
Subject: |
Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:58:18 -0700 |
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:10:13 +0200
Pascal Bourguignon <pjb@informatimago.com> wrote:
> Chris B. Vetter writes:
> > For example in my case, I usually only have time (and the will) to
> > do some private programming over the weekend, at home where I
> > (voluntarily) do not have Internet access.
> Don't be silly!
Huh?
If that refers to me not having Internet at home, that is indeed so.
There are people who try to have some semblance of a private life
during weekends, you know ;-)
Oh, yea, I don't have a TV either...
> > So online documentation is pretty much useless from my point of
> > view.
> wget
And what good exactly will running 'wget' be if
a) I don't have Internet available
b) GNUstep (Foundation and AppKit) specific documentatin shows a short
"Description forthcoming."
Besides, I do install the documentation along with GNUstep, so I do
have it available. But most of the methods are not documented (except
for the phrase above) so I usually end up digging through the header
and source files.
--
Chris
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, (continued)
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Boudewijn Rempt, 2003/06/12
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Christopher Browne, 2003/06/12
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/12
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, William F. Adams, 2003/06/13
- Message not available
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, MJ Ray, 2003/06/14
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/06/16
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??,
Chris B. Vetter <=
- Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/06/16
- Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Pascal Bourguignon, 2003/06/16
- Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Chris B. Vetter, 2003/06/16
- Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt?? ), Eric Christopherson, 2003/06/21
- Re: Back to the main thread (was: Re: Why is GNUstep lesssuccessful than GTK and Qt?? ), Adam Fedor, 2003/06/21
- Most elegant solution to Reader/Writer Problem with Objective-C?, Lachlan Deck, 2003/06/18
Re: Why is GNUstep less successful than GTK and Qt??, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2003/06/16