[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for qualitycontr
Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for qualitycontrol)
Fri, 07 Nov 2003 10:38:59 -0500
Philip Mötteli wrote:
> Am 01.11.2003 um 22:43 schrieb Jason Clouse:
> > On 2003-11-01 12:48:49 +0100 Philip Mötteli <address@hidden>
> > wrote:
> > Business is fine and all but Linux was built largely by volunteers
> > doing it for fun. And volunteers are usually willing to help port
> > stuff if it isn't too difficult. I don't see any reason to shun
> > amateurs and hobbyists if they're willing to help out.
> I don't think Linux would be, where it is now, without having entered
> (successfully) the enterprise world. I'm sorry.
The hobbyists got Linux to the point where it was a credible contender, the
enterprise just brought money. So while it almost certainly would not be as
popular, it would still be approximately as good.
| Jeff Teunissen -=- Pres., Dusk To Dawn Computing -=- deek @ d2dc.net
| GPG: 1024D/9840105A 7102 808A 7733 C2F3 097B 161B 9222 DAB8 9840 105A
| Core developer, The QuakeForge Project http://www.quakeforge.net/
| Specializing in Debian GNU/Linux http://www.d2dc.net/~deek/
Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Quentin Mathé, 2003/11/02
Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Chris B. Vetter, 2003/11/03